Chapter 6: Animal Poaching

In Chapter 6, there was a comment where General Hector laid his boots on the Ivory comforter. This struck interest in animal poaching and killings. I found some statistical information on African elephants and discovered a recent study that provides the first reliable continent-wide estimates. In the last three years alone, over 100,000 elephants have been poached, with their ivory being shipped out to black markets on the Asian continent and elsewhere. In 2011, one in every 12 elephants where being poached, and in just over a decade their populations have decreased by over 64% (Scriber). The deaths of some of the more beloved and well known elephants such as Torn Ear and Satao promped officials in the US to ban the commercial sale of ivory goods (Geiling). However, it has done little to slow the criminal progress of these poachers. I expanded this inquiry to see how many other species are being pushed to the edge of extinction because of over-hunting/poaching. Overall a lot of them occur on the African continent, such as many types of feline, elephants, and rhino species (Listverse). Cheetah populations are down to 12,400, which is forcing the species into a genetic bottleneck that could affect its ability to survive later on to certain diseases and predators even if the population does rebound. However humans have gone through a similar event over 80,000 years ago where the population dwindled to around 30,000 individuals. It’s the same story with Lion species, which have decreased by 50% and are down to around 15,000. The Black Rhino population has decreased by similar percentages, with the Northern White Rhino species down to 4 individuals, with just one male left. Their species will not be able to recover from this and will go extinct within the century.

I wanted to focus on cultures that have been heavily extracting animal’s parts, and wondered why it is done on such a scale. It is predominately a result of Chinese Medicine (Steelsmith), specifically aphrodisiacs made from these larger animal species. It’s amazing how far the human species will go to attain an adequate sex drive. These animal parts are also believed to have immunity, energy, and stamina benefits. They also have an interesting approach to medicine, based on thousands of years of herbal study. They don’t quite focus on the actual illness, but find herb solutions that give better health to the body to deal with the disease on its own. Parts crushed from a rhino’s horn aren’t directly viewed as a form of Viagra, but something to help boost the body, which will in turn boost sex drive. I began researching whether or not these animal components have any qualities that benefit human health, and there may be a link. Rhino horn gives the consumers a diet with extra calcium and phosphorous, which is actually beneficial in the Asian regions it’s consumed in that have a poor diet. This added diet will help overall health and development, which will lead to better sex drive, thus reinforcing the idea that a Rhino’s horn is in essence a sex boost (Handwerk). Although they don’t have to kill these animal species to extinction, they can just simply take calcium and phosphorous supplements to have the same effect. Some other animal parts have a similar effect, but overall it’s mostly a placebo effect that certain cultures have ingrained in their societies as causing a health effect when it doesn’t.

I began researching ways to possibly limit poaching activity, and came across ideas to pool in a military just for defending these animals. To increase patrols and create legislation that prevents the sale of these goods. However, some think this is the wrong approach to it, as these methods increase the prices of said animal parts (Challender). This puts incentives on criminal organizations to go to greater lengths to get the very last member of a particular species to get a hefty payout. There are work arounds, however, such as working with these poorer communities that are at risk for these criminal activities and helping them foster a conservation effort of natural wildlife, and in the long term reduce demand through social marketing programs.

I was interested in certain cultures that happen to worship certain animals and give them a higher quality and standing than even human beings. I wondered if perhaps their cultural perspectives led them to have the opposite view towards animal life that is seen in the modern world. Many ancient societies worshipped animals as forms of deities. The Egyptians regarded felines highly, the Mycenaeans in the Mediterranean worshipped several variations of horse-like creatures, Latin American cultures had high admiration towards serpents, and in India today, cows are seen with a high status (Cook). These unique cultural ideas mostly stem from these early societies attempting to understand the world. Their spiritual beliefs revolved around these animals as a way to explain why the world around them behaved the way it did. However, there was some sort of disconnect of animal deities as humans advanced to reach higher levels of development.

This related back to the research done in the previous chapter about how humans view and classify sentience and what is considered “alive”. When we talk about ourselves, especially in evolution, one can seem to get a biased idea that we are the ultimate lifeform on the planet. When that is merely a subjective idea that we handed ourselves. Our depictions of evolutionary lineage shows our chimp cousins slowly changing into humans, as if evolution had some linear goal to achieve human sentience. It has also led to the common idea that chimps will eventually evolve to be like human beings, completely misunderstanding natural selection and the fact there is no epitome of evolution to be reached. This lead to further research into Peter Singers work, where he discusses our moral responsibility of extending rights towards animals. Singer puts forth the idea of animal equality, that human beings and its family members within the entire animal kingdom should be treated as equals. Here is an excerpt from his article “Practical Ethics”:

“The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may one day come to be recognized that the number of the legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum, are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate.” (Singer)

Perhaps if modern society took this idea seriously, our aggressive and cruel forms of animal husbandry would disappear off the face of the earth. There are proponents against this idea, stating that humans have a biological need to feed off of these animal species. This statement is usually an underlying argument for the taste of animal meat itself, as many forms plant life can provide healthy dietary regiment. Through science and technology we’ve been able to find alternative methods of meat farming that aren’t as environmentally damaging and unsustainable, like in-vitro meat. It is growing animal tissue without the need of the animal actually being born. It’s highly expensive but is seen as a human alternative to current slaughtering practices (Future Food). If that’s not appealing, there’s a new burger on the market that actually tastes like meat, but is made of plants and has similar protein amounts thanks to biochemistry professor, Patrick Brown. By extracting the heme protein found in nitrogen fixing plants, is a component of hemoglobin found in blood, which gives meat its flavors (Starr). This is seen as a major breakthrough in society’s movement towards a more sustainable diet as the planet’s population continues to increase and the available resources for conventional animal farming decrease.


Scriber, National Geographic PUBLISHED August 18, 2014, Brad. “100,000 Elephants Killed by Poachers in Just Three Years, Landmark Analysis Finds.” National Geographic. Accessed October 8, 2015.

Geiling, Natasha. “Obama Proposes Sweeping Ban On U.S. Ivory Sales.” ThinkProgress RSS. July 27, 2015. Accessed October 8, 2015.

“8 Endangered Species Still Hunted – Listverse.” Listverse. June 10, 2013. Accessed October 8, 2015.

Challender, Daniel W. S., and Douglas C. MacMillan. 2014. “Poaching is more than an Enforcement Problem”. Conservation Letters. 7 (5): 484-494.

Steelsmith, Laurie. “Acupuncture & Chinese Medicine Basics.” About Acupuncture and Chinese Herbal Medicine. What Is Qi? Accessed October 8, 2015. Information/Detail/Chinese Herbal Aphrodisiacs

Handwerk, Brian. “Do Aphrodisiacs Really Work?” National Geographic. Accessed October 8, 2015.

Cook, A. B. “Animal Worship in the Mycenaean Age.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies: 81. Accessed October 8, 2015.

“Cultured Meat.” Future Food. Accessed October 8, 2015.

Singer, Peter. “Equality for Animals?” Practical Ethics: 48-70. Accessed October 8, 2015.—-.htm.

Starr, Michelle. “The Veggie Burger That Bleeds like Real Meat – CNET.” CNET. Accessed October 8, 2015.


3 thoughts on “Chapter 6: Animal Poaching

  1. annawallace003 says:

    Your post makes me think back to the recent news story about Cecil the lion. I became interested to learn more about controversies such as these and if you haven’t heard about Cecil already, it would be extremely relevant to your research. Because the majority of poaching happens outside of the U.S, it is a concept that I often times forget about and you blog post really engaged my concern in this horrible practice.
    I found it interesting that you able to accredit Chinese medicine to a large contributor to poaching. I have seen signs advocating the use of this type of medical treatment but I have never been able to put together what it actually is. I would of assumed that it was a way up treating illnesses so I was completely shocked to find out what it actually consists of! I also agree with your thought process of just taking a vitamin supplement instead of going to the extreme and killing an almost extinct species.
    As far as developing a solution to this problem, you have some good thoughts and ideas. It is a hard obstacle for a poor community to overcome but I feel like there has to be some sort of plan that could be implemented in attempt to stop poaching.
    You mentioned in class that maybe one day we won’t be discriminating on how many legs a being has and move toward a world of even higher equality. I find this prediction thought provoking along with what you had to say about needing four worlds to support an American style diet worldwide.
    Great work!



  2. Michael Pedersen says:

    Great post! Your research into the over poaching of various animals really shows how fragile animal species have become due to human actions. Your discussion of why poaching is so prominent due to aphrodisiac production was very enlightening partially do to how unexpected yet extremely apt it was given your previous research.

    You mentioned how ancient societies valued the lives of animals in a religious or spiritual sense in order to better explain their world. Another reason why modern societies have moved away from worshipping animals as they did is because we are simply not exposed to them as much. In an “out of sight, out of mind” like process we have been partitioning our entire culture based on production and consumption. As a result, we simply take animals, and the food they provide, for granted much of the time.

    As for the future of food production, the idea of artificial meat and meat substitutes are incredibly interesting ideas. I agree with what you said in class about the impossibility of our continued reliance on abundant meat sources. That being said there is some research occurring about the feasibility of vertical farming methods and the increased crop yields that can be achieved through such a method. In general the idea is that through super efficient solar cells and l.e.d lighting optimized to the wavelengths of light needed for growing specific plants we’ll be able to create much more bio material with less water and less space. As urbanization and water shortages continue this idea has been gaining a lot of traction in recent years and if you decide to continue on this line of inquiry I hope you look into it.

    Overall, I’m consistently impressed by the amount of research you bring into your papers and the amount of questions you explore in each. I look forward to reading your next blog entries.

    – Michael Pedersen


  3. ballen68 says:

    Your post is extremely interesting along with the info you shared in class. You have extracted all your research from various sources compared to other people, which shows you really took time to learn more on the topic.

    I disagree with a lot of your thoughts on humans and our origination, mostly because none of that has been proven. Though we are genetically very similar to a chimpanzee we are more so genetically similar in our brains to a dolphin than the chimpanzee. We are also 50% genetically similar to a banana even once it has been harvested. huge difference between us and a banana, also a huge difference between us and a chimpanzee. That 98.8% similarity comes from what I believe is a like creator. If the same creator made both of us, odds are we will be very similar. This is a huge debate that has gone on for really long, and so it’s hard to really discuss in a blog reply, but I just figured I would give you a few small thoughts to think about. Also, why do we not have certain species walking around that have evolved closer to the human from the chimpanzee?

    The poaching part of your post is actually something I thought of a couple months ago. I was in an office in downtown Charlotte and went into the CEO’s office and he had exotic animals that he had hunted all up on his walls. I was pretty frustrated, and it changed my opinion of him because these animals were beautiful, many harmless, and many inedible. I could never kill an animal for no reason. I do believe in hunting for food that we are going to eat, mostly because it is less painful to the animal. I also believe that if you genuinely love animals and you hunt then it gives you more of an appreciation for meat when you have it, because you don’t normally want to have to go out and harvest more meat. Atleast that is how it has been for me and many of my friends.

    You did a phenomenal job on you blog, supporting it with many facts and then raising thought provoking questions about the issue and the implications that it has on the way we think of the human race. I think another are for you to possibly explore more in depth is the solution to the problem. If I were a villager and my kids had no food and I had no other option or felt I had no other option but to poach, then I believe I would. How do we provide them more options than poaching, how can we make it worth it for them to stop killing these animals?



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s